Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Use wiki forward instead of tinyurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244924 ------- Additional Comments From kwade@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-20 19:35 EST ------- Thanks for the idea; we just began exploring the #REFRESH directive, which does an actual <meta http-equiv="refresh"...>. I definitely see advantages in this approach: * Don't have to modify the URL each release (as we do in getting a new tinyurl) * Memorable URL * Relies upon tool that aren't likely to break or change in behavior However, I'm curious what made you think about this in the first place? That is, you refer to obfuscation, which has a negative connotation -- as if we are intentionally trying to hide something. Or is it just that tinyurl.com links are risky because you don't know where they go, even if you trust the source that wrote them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. -- Fedora-relnotes-content mailing list Fedora-relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-relnotes-content
