On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 17:34 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote: > > > > R2spec was designed to easily create spec file which would then be > > reviewed and corrected by human. It has evolved to include rpm > building > > but I have the feeling that it might need a good redesign, maybe a > > version 3.0.0 ;-) > > The version I got from EPEL was 3.0.3.. ? Sorry I meant 4.0.0 > I would be delighted to help if you are interested in it. My previous > wave of changes did not meet with your approval, and I inferred that > this meant you look at the problem differently than I do. I am not > offended by this, it's your project. But I did stop trying to > contribute. > > I definitely look at the problem from the perspective of "Automatic > production of entire dependency chains". If you think that is a > worthwhile direction to go, I would be happy to help get there. R2spec remains a project designed to make the life of Fedora's R packager's easier, so it has to remain guideline compliant. That is a reason why putting the source0 as URL also is not *in my opinion* a good approach (while I actually do like the --URL option). There was a time when I thought I would try to get an "automatic cran builder" working but atm I have other priorities. Pierre _______________________________________________ r-devel mailing list r-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
