On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:57:16PM +0000, David Lutterkort wrote: > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 13:56 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > This was the patch I just added (attached). > > > > I didn't want to get into the game of adding every single package[1] > > to comps.xml, so I just added a handful of major, commonly used > > packages. For now at least. > > Excellent. > > > On your specific point about omake, it's not so widely used. Lots of > > packages use ordinary (GNU) make + autoconf. There are also competing > > build systems like OCamlMakefile, ocamlbuild, and actually a few more. > > (For a minority language, we do have far too many build systems ...) > > Since there are so many to choose from, there's definitely no point in > preferring one over the other - from your comps.xml patch though it > seems that none of them is offered as optional packages in the OCaml > group. Wouldn't it make sense to add them to that list ? Yes, I guess it would. I've hit another really annoying problem though - you can't run the packagekit management remotely!! Seriously, try running 'gpk-application' on another machine ... So I can't test if my changes to comps had any effect yet. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora _______________________________________________ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
