On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 13:56 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This was the patch I just added (attached). > > I didn't want to get into the game of adding every single package[1] > to comps.xml, so I just added a handful of major, commonly used > packages. For now at least. Excellent. > On your specific point about omake, it's not so widely used. Lots of > packages use ordinary (GNU) make + autoconf. There are also competing > build systems like OCamlMakefile, ocamlbuild, and actually a few more. > (For a minority language, we do have far too many build systems ...) Since there are so many to choose from, there's definitely no point in preferring one over the other - from your comps.xml patch though it seems that none of them is offered as optional packages in the OCaml group. Wouldn't it make sense to add them to that list ? David _______________________________________________ Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list Fedora-ocaml-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
