On 09/27/2010 08:40 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:25:58AM +0600, Rashadul Islam wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Bruno Wolff III<bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:37:42 -0400, >>> "Paul W. Frields"<stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> This is an odd use of<ref> as a replacement for bullet lists. A >>>> <ref> usually means a footnote that adds to other text. Here's the >>>> results that come out in one of our test pages when there's an >>>> "unattached"<ref> or footnote (look for numbers 21 and up): >>> They work odd as well. Clicking on the link in the description brings >>> you to the real link in the footnote area (more or less) and then you >>> have to click on that link to get to the actual web page. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> news mailing list >>> news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news >>> >> I am just confused with the examples. Please get me out of my confusion: >> >> 1. We should write the link straight as "star followed by the hyperlink" >> >> * http://url1.com >> * http://url2.com > Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is > simply to list URLs by themselves. > >> or >> >> >> 2. Just the below: "star followed by the text and use<ref>.....</ref>" >> * The Fedora Insight system<ref>http://url3.com</ref> > Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is to > list text, where the text has a reference to a URL. > >> or All the above? If yes, then when we should use each of them. > Hope the above guidance helps. Thanks Paul and Rashadul! I think these examples illustrate the use cases very clearly. Paul, I will watch out for list URLs in upcoming beats and change as necessary. I'll also carve out some time today to update the workflow page for beats accordingly. - pascal _______________________________________________ news mailing list news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
