On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:25:58AM +0600, Rashadul Islam wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:37:42 -0400, > > "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This is an odd use of <ref> as a replacement for bullet lists. A > > > <ref> usually means a footnote that adds to other text. Here's the > > > results that come out in one of our test pages when there's an > > > "unattached" <ref> or footnote (look for numbers 21 and up): > > > > They work odd as well. Clicking on the link in the description brings > > you to the real link in the footnote area (more or less) and then you > > have to click on that link to get to the actual web page. > > _______________________________________________ > > news mailing list > > news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news > > > > I am just confused with the examples. Please get me out of my confusion: > > 1. We should write the link straight as "star followed by the hyperlink" > > * http://url1.com > * http://url2.com Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is simply to list URLs by themselves. > or > > > 2. Just the below: "star followed by the text and use <ref>.....</ref>" > * The Fedora Insight system<ref>http://url3.com</ref> Yes, this is the form you would use if the purpose of the list is to list text, where the text has a reference to a URL. > or All the above? If yes, then when we should use each of them. Hope the above guidance helps. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ news mailing list news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
