> > > >
> > > > 1) as soon as an issue is released, an editor-type changes the date to
> > > > the next deadline day, and marks every beat as "INCOMPLETE".
> > > >
> > > > 2) Beats that don't have a writer are marked as "NO WRITER".
> > > >
> > > > 3) Beats that have a writer but aren't happening that week, for whatever
> > > > reason, are marked as "NOT HAPPENING".
> > > >
> > > > 4) Beats that are in progress are marked "IN PROGRESS".
> > > >
> > > > 5) Beats that are finished are marked "COMPLETE" along with a note to
> > > > list.
> > >
> >
> > Do you expect the beat writers to do this?
>
> Yes please. Unless it seems like too much extra burden. Obviously
> editors would take care of #2 "NO WRITER" but all the other information
> is more easily available to the actual beat writer. So instead of the
> editorial team sending out queries to see what is happening the beat
> writer can just jump straight to a central place to update us on the
> status.
>
I'd be willing to mark it complete, but I don't plan to mark something in
progress. That seems like a rather silly and pointless step.
This is one of the problems with new leadership. It's easy to step in and
start over-engineering a currently working process. Be mindful of your
changes. These people are volunteers and too much process will push people
away.
--
JB
_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
