On 23.04.2007 21:17, Thomas Chung wrote: > On 4/23/07, Oisin Feeley <oisin.feeley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm confused. I thought I understood the issue, but obviously I >> don't. More importantly I'm not sure what the erratum should be? >> >> I like Thomas and Thorsten's idea of adding an erratum to the issue in >> which an error occurred, and also adding a brief erratum in the next >> issue. As Thorsten points out it's fairly normal practice for other >> publications. >> >> Apologies for getting it wrong, and for still not getting it. :( >> >> Does Thorsten have a suggestion for a brief clarification? That would >> help a lot. > > I'm still waiting an official "Errata Request" from Thorsten. > After we review the submission, we'll update the wiki and issue an > Errata FWN if necessary. > Regards, Sorry, timezones are fun -- I shut down the computer and went to bed yesterday when the discussion started here. CU thl
