I'm confused. I thought I understood the issue, but obviously I don't. More importantly I'm not sure what the erratum should be? I like Thomas and Thorsten's idea of adding an erratum to the issue in which an error occurred, and also adding a brief erratum in the next issue. As Thorsten points out it's fairly normal practice for other publications. Apologies for getting it wrong, and for still not getting it. :( Does Thorsten have a suggestion for a brief clarification? That would help a lot. Oisin On 4/23/07, Thomas Chung <tchung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/23/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Agreed, but things happen. Fixing them in the wiki is better then > letting wrong stuff stay there while it is the current issue. In > addition it might be the best to mention the error and its fix in the > next issue somewhere (a special errata section maybe) and everybody > should be happy afaics. That how print magazines do it, too (at least > here in Germany). Yes, we'll fixed them on the wiki as well as issuing an Errata FWN if necessary. Regards, -- Thomas Chung http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung _______________________________________________ Fedora-news-list mailing list Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
