I'm not so sure it was pointless to identify when f-devel-l gets hijacked and what the consequences are. Not feeding the trolls on list is pretty important, but talking about the consequences and facts of it all seems like it might be useful. The slight derisive tone is interesting to me, as well. So, I'm not sure that I disagree with Rahul. I'm also not sure that I agree. -------- Forwarded Message -------- The following page has been changed by RahulSundaram: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Beats/Developments?action=diff&rev2=73&rev1=72 The comment on the change is: pointless ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg01088.html 2. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg01101.html - - === A Very Confusing Thread With No Apparent Point === - A very long thread [1] which started out with a generalised complaint about multimedia support and wandered into LiveCD generation led to a repeated call from DavidZeuthen to please not feed the trolls and to leave @fedora-devel clear for development discussions. - - The thread wasn't so much a train-wreck as a multi-vehicle pileup in the fog. Survivors wandered out confused and with suspected injuries, unsure of where they'd ended up. - - 1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg00954.html -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
