On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:05:58 -0400 Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:33:56 -0400 > > Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:29:43 +0100 > >> "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > In recent weeks a lot of mailing list traffic I would have expected to > >> > come to this list has gone to fedora-devel. People seem confused as to > >> > what should be discussed where wrt to these two lists. Heck, in recent > >> > weeks, it's not clear to me. Can we either get a lot more disciplined > >> > about pointing out when people are using the wrong list or (this would > >> > be my choice) kill off fedora-maintainers. > >> > >> I'm +1 for killing -maintainers. Now that we have > >> fedora-devel-announce people can, if they wish, not get all the "noise" > >> of fedora-devel and instead just get the announcements. Since > >> fedora-devel-announce postings go to fedora-devel-list as well, you > >> don't have to subscribe to yet another announce list if you don't want > >> to. > > > > +1 to killing it. > > > > josh > > > > > Apparently, asking this list was the wrong way to get things done. How > do we really do this? Does this need to be proposed to some group? > Does this need to come up for vote at some meeting? How do we actually > cut the life support here? FESCo would be my best guess. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
