On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 10:38 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:29:47AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 09:56 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > > Then you speak up and say "hey, I dislike that; can you fix that please > > > so it nearly as easy than before". Other spare-time-contributors agree, > > > but nothing happens for months. Then you again say "I really dislike > > > that" and then someone from the professional part says "make it better > > > yourself; just learn foo and bar "(which for most people will be some > > > days of work if they never touched foo or bar before; time that BTW will > > > be lost for the stuff you like and do well)" and make yourself familiar > > > with foobar; then improve it yourself". I'd feel really pissed of at > > > that point, > > Pretty nicely summarized, how I feel about many of the developments wrt. > > Fedora since the merger ;) > > > > Wrt. my request, I feel bodhi is lacking an essential key-feature, > > without which efficient and reliable usage of bodhi is impossible. > > > > The actual problem can be summarized in one simple sentence: > > Where/how to find "my built, but yet not released packages in bodhi"? > > $ koji list-tagged --latest dist-fc7-updates-candidate | grep $USERNAME bodhi? The actual usability problem is bodhi<->koji interaction. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly