On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:00:04AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Rahul Sundaram pisze: > > Hans de Goede wrote: > >> > >> And why not ? They worked well enough before, didn't they? > >> > >> Don't get me wrong I'm in favor of updates announcements and of > >> avoiding unneeded updates. > > > > If you already in favor of these, I don't think you need any convincing > > that these are important for the end users. Sure, they aren't absolutely > > necessary but these are an improvement over what we had previously and > > there is some additional overhead as part of that. > > > > If anyone in favor of the processes then implementation details can be > > improved. If anyone thinks that the processes themselves are not useful > > then any implementation won't make them happy. Don't mix these. > > > > Rahul > The other problem is that pup does not display the info maintainers put > into bodhi yet. This data will appear soon. luke -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
