On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 03:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > You know one thing I really dislike? I dislike it when people keep > > dodging the bullet in a discussion. What both Ralf and I are trying to > > make clear is that the new procedures cause lots of annoying extra > > little steps, we are not trying to rewind the clock to the pre merge > > release model. Right, I want to be able to use the infrastructure I am supposed to use, in efficient ways. ATM, this simply isn't possible. > That has not been clear to me so far. It appeared for a while that there > was suggestions being made that pre-merge model worked fine Nope. While I certainly think the pre-merge model worked fine, I am not proposing to revert the clock. Nevertheless, I think the current work-flow/process model suffers from flaws and it to be over-engineered, but I am not complaining about it, because it doesn't interest me. It's THEM who want it. As long as I am not _forced_ to use it, I am fine with it. > and neither > the processes nor tools have offered any improvements. Well, IMO, to most contributors/maintainers, they offer very little improvements. The tools offer eye-candy, but that's essentially all. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
