On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 03:36 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 03:24 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 03:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>>> Hans de Goede wrote: > >>>>> And why not ? They worked well enough before, didn't they? > >>>>> > >>>>> Don't get me wrong I'm in favor of updates announcements and of avoiding > >>>>> unneeded updates. > >>>> If anyone in favor of the processes then implementation details can be > >>>> improved. > >>> This sounds suspiciously like you to just have volunteered? > >> No. If I wanted to volunteer, I would make that explicit. No need to > >> read things I haven't said. > > Then better stop being vocal about issues not interesting nor affecting you. > > It does interest me and affects me. Nevertheless you continue to flood us with what I consider to be shallow word bubbles on praise of the new build-system (esp. bodhi)? Rahul, at least Hans and I are affected by the issues on an almost daily basis, probably due to the large amount of packages each of us maintains. Seriously affected, to be more precise. It's a massive work-flow regression, to use a "no-word". > If you want to stop opinions just > because I didn't volunteer that would apply to everyone in the discussion. OK, given your opinion on bodhi, you are certainly able to show me all of "my built but not released fc7 packages"? I am not able to find them. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
