On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 03:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Wrong. > > > > Somebody decided _THEY_ wanted it, because _THEY_ think this bureaucracy > > is necessary and _THEY_ proceeded with it, because _THEY_ had the powers > > to implement it. > > > > FE had lived long enough to demonstrate it could prosper and live > > without this blown-up overhead. > > FE didn't have updates-testing, didn't do update announcements, had a > rolling release model etc. Those things don't work in a merged world. That's what THEY (and apparently you think) want you to believe. FE worked quite well without it. Actually, updates-testing is an option which can be useful for a small minority of package, but ATM, updates-testing doesn't work well, either. Finally, updates-testing isn't the issue this thread started with. It's lack of usability of bodhi and the work-flow underneath, and passivity/refusal/inability of the those who are in charge of bodhi to improve it. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
