Hello Till, On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Till Maas wrote: > I updated it and made a scratch rebuild, I noticed that the old one only > required libpopt.so.0 (and a lot of not popt related stuff), but the new one > also has a libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0) requirement. Is this worth a rebuild? sorry, I overlooked your e-mail. It doesn't really matter whether your package depends on libpopt.so.0 and/or libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0). The new popt version uses exports which are detected and catched up by rpm. As the library is ABI and API compatible & named same, this is not of any belong. Greetings, Robert -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
