On Fr August 24 2007, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Here's the list, regenerated minutes ago in case something has changed. Maybe you can generate the list with the FAS-username in the first column in sorted by it, this will it make easier for maintainers to identify their packages. But I do not know, how. > cryptsetup-luks-1.0.5-4.fc8.src.rpm I updated it and made a scratch rebuild, I noticed that the old one only required libpopt.so.0 (and a lot of not popt related stuff), but the new one also has a libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0) requirement. Is this worth a rebuild? Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
