On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 08:09 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 16:43 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > >> On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 19:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > <anip> > > I say just put an epoch in there and be done with it, epoch's where invented > for situations like this, they aren't pretty. But they aren't evil or something > either, and they are a way better solution then the other hacks suggested. Well, there is another alternative: Not doing anything. Most of the packages, the upgrade to OSG-2 breaks, are dead upstream anyway, or can be build against OSG-2 with a couple of tweaks ;) Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
