-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:58:20 -0700 > Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I don't disagree with the idea of changing all the active branches >> when all the active branches belong to the same person. But when the >> active branches belong to different people I don't think you can >> assume that the intention is to set the owner on all branches. > > Unless all owners fall under the same sponsor/manager. > Well... not really even then. This assumption works if the manager is handing out packages to workers to take care of. It does not work if a manager is in charge of people who are working on projects. - -Toshio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGy1ghX6yAic2E7kgRAqFqAJ9bCYyUVQoy3OS/z85z9wGW3Go1cwCfYWrZ xJqnHjpzZM/68OvslqJHeRQ= =b52o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
