-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:37:00 -0700 > Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Where it breaks down even for the cvsadmins is what to do when there >> are different owners on different package-branches. For instance, >> Foo is the owner in RHL8-FC2. Bar is the FC3-devel owner, and Baz is >> the EL5 owner. I don't think that admins will often want to change >> all of those. > > Actually that happens /very/ frequently within Red Hat engineering, > where packages as a whole are reassigned to a different maintainer. > I don't disagree with the idea of changing all the active branches when all the active branches belong to the same person. But when the active branches belong to different people I don't think you can assume that the intention is to set the owner on all branches. >> - --global could error out when it encounters such a situation.... But >> this is going to become more common because we probably don't want or >> need to change ownership on EOL releases. > > --global would just plain ignore EOL release branches. Don't ask don't tell WRT EOL branches could make sense and just error out on differences in active branches. - -Toshio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGy1HsX6yAic2E7kgRAiM2AJ0aS1PNBeibAR+y1inaKc08We1MLACgrrg0 iy0IQQDtG40V+Od9YfsRwBM= =9F04 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
