On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 09:57 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > I think it should be consider part of the complete source code for GPL projects. > That aside, the spec files _are_ the instructions for the distribution, if not > intertwined and confusing. But they document what we do to construct the > distribution. Should that collection of knowledge not be licensed? My argument is that the CLA covers the licensing of original works in Fedora by CLA signers. However, since the CLA permits sublicensing, you could easily say that your spec files are under the GPL. As long as the license that you choose for your spec file doesn't limit the rights granted by the CLA, you're fine. ~spot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
