On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 09:26 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 8/16/07, Simo Sorce <ssorce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > /me imagines an angry author shouting at C violation by Fedora because > > we mark something GPL+ instead of GPLv2+ or GPLv3+ > > Any upstream that would get in a huff over this should already be at > our door with pitchforks and torches in hand for just using the string > "GPL" in the past. As we clean it up I have no doubt we will get some > of them wrong, but thats OKAY. I welcome as much communication as > necessary with upstream developers to clarify exactly what variation > of GPL is being used in more complicated cases. This is my wish as well, that's why I just strongly suggest contacting the upstream developers in case of doubt. I suggest nothing else, the current practice as just today amended by Spot is quite sane FWICS. Simo. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
