Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> Please, please, please do this. Take a minute and go through your
> packages and correct the specs so that they are using the new
> License tagging schema.

FWIW, in the few weeks since the new guidelines were announced, ~1269
spec files have been updated.  As of 2007-08-16 04:30 UTC, in the
devel branch:

72.81% of spec files (3392 out of 4659) have invalid licenses

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In my life, I have prayed but one prayer: oh Lord, make my enemies
ridiculous. And God granted it.
    -- Voltaire

Attachment: pgpaaSGHDOtwU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux