Enrico Scholz wrote:
The initsystem is minit (http://www.fefe.de/minit/); I created initscripts
for daemons used by me (see http://ensc.de/fedora/minit-scripts.spec for a
list).
Well,
Why not to add Clamav to your minit-scripts.spec as well? Why this way
of packaging (separate -sysv) should be seen for all Fedora people now?
Certainly it could be a hint for community to do similar sub-packages
for all the init scripts, but it seems that that way was not accepted...
This would need a rebuild of the package. I do not see the problem with
the current version: 'yum install ...' on default installations installs
the -sysv initscripts
Sure!
But the problem is something like "reputation".
Recently we chose antivirus for some wide-enough network, comparing all
pro and contra. On of a little contra for Fedora's Clamav is that it is
"strange packaged", and actually it has moved a bowl of weights, and
some proprietary antivirus had been chosen. :( I think not because of
"sysv" subpackages exactly, but because of some "suspicions/fears"
inspired by it.
~buc
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
