On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:22:21PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Michael E Brown wrote: > >Hans, > > > >There were a couple of MUST items in the review guidelines that merit > >discussion: > > > >- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. > > --> rpmlint also complains about this > >- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. > > --> rpmlint also complains about this > > > > These 2 are definitively not relevant for this package, see for example > also gcc, it includes .obj and .h files too, without putting them in a > seperate -devel package. If the packages sole purpose is to compile other > programs, putting bits of it in a -devel package is nonsense. > > > >This package is a cross-compiled libc. Does it fall under these > >guidelines? I dont see any specific guidance for cross-building tools. > > > > Notice that there are some WIP cross compiler packaging guidelines here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Embedded/CrossCompiling > > But these badly need updating. > > And as already said above, clearly it doesn't, because these guidelines do > not make any sense in the case of this package. Ok. That is what I thought, too, but I thought it worth discussing. I'll try to finish the review this weekend. Looking forward to seeing this in the distro. -- Michael -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
