On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:40:05 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > I would very strongly vote in favor of: "WONTFIX; please reopen this bug against F7 if it still exists there." > > >From one of the QA meetings a month or so back I took the action item to create a proposal for how to deal with bugzillas like this. I'll try to have something proposed on the wiki by the start of next week. FWIW, when FC4 was EOL'd, I mass updated the fc4 targeted BZ tickets into NEEDINFO state with the following comment: ---- This report targets the FC3 or FC4 products, which have now been EOL'd. Could you please check that it still applies to a current Fedora release, and either update the target product or close it ? Thanks. ---- 470 fc4-targeted tickets are still in this state (which I think I'll just WONTFIX close soon). I seem to remember some folks did as asked, and a few sent me hate mails about not fixing the problem... :-) I can do a mass update to NEEDINFO for the fc5 blocking bugs if we decide that's the best way to go. Cheers, C -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
