On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 16:15 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 16:13 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Thursday 05 July 2007 16:15:02 Michael Thomas wrote: > > > What about adding 'Requires(post): coreutils' to bring in 'touch' for > > > the gtk+ icon cache scriptlet: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246770 > > > > > > It seems excessive to me, because I can't imagine a situation where > > > coreutils would not get installed. But I also haven't looked that > > > closely at the dependency tree either. > > > > Often it's not about whether it will be installed or not, but rather it's > > about whether it will be installed /before/ your %pre/%post script is ran if > > the packages are in the same transaction (IE installer or big upgrades). > > > > Now that we are discussing this again, I'd like to point out that the > recent ldconfig/%posttrans discussion is somewhat related to this. If > we can make %posttrans useful for ldconfig, we can use it for icon cache > updates too. That would be a big win. > That would be great. Unfortunately, %posttrans doesn't work in the ldconfig case because it doesn't run when only erasing packages. Will that make a difference for gtk-update-icon-cache as well? BTW, what happened to your --delay patch to gtk-update-icon-cache? That also sounded promising for the performance aspect of calling it multiple times from scriptlets. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
