On Thursday 05 July 2007, Hans de Goede wrote: > Florian La Roche wrote: > > > The error output is a real bug, so just closing this is not very > > good. > > I agree that its a bug. However as said the scriptlet recipe was changed > from checking to not checking, I'm sure this was discussed and there were > reasons. So lets first discuss this with the people who made this change. Well, I don't remember if I was involved in that, but if we don't want the scriptlet to fail and don't want to display the error output (no matter whether it's because of a missing executable or some other error running it), dunno if checking first adds any value. Not adding the dependency is there because it'd pull in GTK to non-GTK setups for no gain. This is fine and should be preserved, but actually, I think the snippet/guideline should be changed so that the Requires(post) and Requires(postun) dependencies *should* be added in cases where the packaged app requires GTK itself anyway, and left out just like currently if it doesn't. Opinions? -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
