On Monday 25 June 2007 21:15:49 Axel Thimm wrote: > That was one of the three options ;) > > I think a security-updates would not be bad, but maybe not in this > cycle, there's lot to do in short time and having a Fedora > enterprise-like stable branch with security updates isn't Fedora's > typical usage scenario. It's a tough thing to provide, and it would require anybody building a security update to build in two collections, potentially having multiple branches per release, one for "head" and one for "security", etc.. I think it's totally outside the scope of the Fedora project. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpnlajylJV9G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
