On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:05:11PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 25 June 2007 21:00:45 Axel Thimm wrote: > > So you are really only left with the three alternatives I wrote in a > > previous mail in this thread. > > If that's truly the case, then we should do away with the idea of security > only updates. That was one of the three options ;) I think a security-updates would not be bad, but maybe not in this cycle, there's lot to do in short time and having a Fedora enterprise-like stable branch with security updates isn't Fedora's typical usage scenario. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpyCG2loZdvm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
