On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:45:36PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 19:21 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:03:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote > > > The question I have is why can't we teach the provides finder to be > > > smarter about things that are outside the standard path? Why fix > > > this in N* packages instead of the source? > > > > Could we define a variable in the spec file containing paths that > > are not to be searched? > > This isn't that hard to do if we think it would be useful. And thinking > about it, I'm pretty sure it would be -- a lot of the cases that people > disable the internal dep generator are to be able to do something like > this. And disabling the internal dep generator has other downsides like > not ensuring files are marked with the proper file color. > > The big question is do we just define paths not to be searched or a > blacklist of things not to include or the like. Allow a blacklist method per package. This is a problem that cannot be globally solved. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpV8LIxZDnaW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
