Peter Jones (pjones@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > I don't think we /really/ care about the "rpath's in other packages" > case. If the other packages need firefox's copy of zlib, they should > require firefox (or at least the library directory it's dropping in?) Nah, just expand the symbol-versioning meta-markup to handle paths too, and use that when resolving deps if things actually have RPATHs. Bill -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
