Re: gprolog i386,i486,i586,i686 rpms?!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 11:49:56 Quentin Spencer wrote:
The atlas package could benefit from this. It provides speed-optimized
binary compatible versions of blas and lapack libs. Currently it uses
the somewhat ugly solution of creating separate atlas-sse, atlas-3dnow,
and atlas-sse2 subpackages.

Can that be encapsulated by an i386 and an i686 build?

Well, no. I was hoping that the implication of this discussion was that other subarches, such as pentium4, were also supported.

Quentin


--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux