On Tuesday 05 June 2007 14:53:59 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi all! > > Just fishing for opinions here. > > EPEL will likely have a comps.xml soon, too. Thus if you add a new > package to Fedora and build it for all supported dists you have to add > the entry to five comps.xml files in the future (Fedora current, Fedora > current-1, Fedora devel, EPEL4 and EPEL5 (not counting Fedora current-2, > which would be FC-5 currently, but that is EOL soon)). > > Isn't there a easier way to maintain that information in the long term? > Maybe via the package database? The only thing that might be different > in the different comps.xml files is afaics the group a package belongs to. > > Or do we simply don't care as we have bigger problems right now? > We know that comps sucks, and we want to fix it. Time and bandwidth are the issues. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpAj55J1yCm5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
