On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:27:50AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 05 June 2007 11:05:48 Axel Thimm wrote: > > Did this poisoning happen often in Fedora Extras? If not then maybe > > it's better to assume that the packages are not poisoning the > > buildroots, and assume the Fedora Extras way instead of the Core way? > > Different data sets really, but still worthy of discussion. Honestly this is > the way it's been internally for a while, since before I got here, and now > we're using a different buildsystem so past data is not exactly relevant. > > Maybe we could experiment with Fedora 7 updates and see what happens? Seems > risky though :/ Alternatively maybe bodhi comes to the rescue and packagers could have another (parallel) level of pushing? Because ideally I would had built apt/synaptic before pushing any of the two to updates-testing. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpBNLWaPxWPO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
