On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:01:27 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > But what's better in the follwing case: > > foo-1.2.3-4.fc6 -> foo-1.2.3-5.fc6 (security fix in updates) > foo-1.2.3-4.fc7 (iso) -> foo-1.2.3-5.fc7 (security fix in updates) > > An updated FC6 will carry foo-1.2.3-5.fc6 and the ISO will not offer > foo-1.2.3-4.fc7 unless it is forced by anaconda (like kernels). That's > a feature not a bug, as otherwise you would suddenly introduce an > already fixed security issue. > > So in fact the non-upgrading from FC6-updates to F7-noupdates is good! Even if it requires a library soname that is only available in FC6 Updates? No. The dist-upgrade to F7 will be broken until foo-1.2.3-5.fc7 is fetched from the online repo and replaces foo-1.2.3-5.fc6 In your scenario, the fc6 and fc7 builds can be swapped. That is not true for many dist-upgrades. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
