Jesse Keating wrote, at 06/03/2007 10:46 PM +9:00: > On Sunday 03 June 2007 07:12:48 Ralf Corsepius wrote: >>> Security updates go straight to Stable already. >> They shouldn't. They should undergo an automated procedure to assure >> they fit cleanly into the existing installations and don't break package >> deps. > > This is not always practical. Should a firefox remote exploit fix be held up > because a fringe package that builds against FF and is used by say 5 people > hasn't been rebuilt yet? Should every use suffer? I seriously hope not. Well, while I feel now that I can hardly catch up with this long thread, I leave one comment for this. While I surely understand that we should take security updates very important, please keep in mind that I hear on Fedora BBS (in Japan) about the strong complaint about dependency break more and more times than the delay of security related updates. Regards, Mamoru -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
