On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 05:06:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Luke Macken <lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Once we agree on a policy, I can implement it. I've heard some people > > suggest letting updates sit in testing for 7 days, and if there are no > > complaints, then they can be pushed to the stable repo. This sounds > > fine to me, what does everyone else think? > > <cough>zero-day security patches</cough> Security updates go straight to Stable already. > A week as a guideline for noncritical updates sounds fine. A week > enforced by the update tool would seriously suck. At the moment it's not enforcing anything, as anyone can mark their updates as stable whenever they want. To implement this guideline, I could have bodhi automatically submit updates to the stable repo after the n days are up. Whether or not we want to take away our ability to mark our own updates as stable and force approval or timeout on test updates is still up for discussion. luke -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
