Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said:
Can it cause regressions for existing users? -> No
Will it get installed automatically by the relative few people who have
updates -testing enabled, and thus see any kind of testing (atleast if its
installable)? -> No
Well, if the packager really futzes up the packaging, it *can*. (Conflicts,
provides/requires that it shouldn't have, etc.) Ideally, all this
stuff is caught in review.
That being said, step one is being able to reliably and automatically tell
what's a *new* package, versus an update, or even a rename/obsolete (e.g.,
pidgin). We can't really change the bodhi workflow until that's done.
Erm, we already have a drop down allowing one to choice from: security fix, bug
fix, enhancement. Whats wrong with adding "new package" to the list?
Regards,
Hans
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
