----- Chuck Anderson (2007-05-22) wrote:----- [...] > As long as the alternatives issues are straightened out first. The > following bug was an F7Blocker until emacs-22.0.99 was removed from > F7/downgraded to emacs-22.0.95-1.fc7 that is currently in rawhide: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239745 > > I have verified that emacs-22.0.95-1.fc7 (the one currently in > rawhide) works properly with glibc-2.6-2 (due in rawhide tomorrow), so > upgrading to 22.0.99 for that reason alone appears unnecessary. > > So I would say that these are the choices: > > 1. Don't put emacs-22.0.99 into F7, and keep emacs-22.0.95 instead. > > 2. Put in emacs-22.0.99 without the alternatives /usr/bin/emacs > changes which cause the regression of having no /usr/bin/emacs at all > after upgrades. > > 3. Fix the scriptlets in emacs-22.0.99 to that a /usr/bin/emacs will > exist after upgrades. Version 22.0.94 has many bugs and that's the last 22 version I have used. Not sure about 22.0.95 tho. -- Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F) -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
