On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:03:54PM -0400, Chip Coldwell wrote: > > All upstream development has been frozen since the first pretest > release, 22.0.90, so by taking 22.0.990 we are getting upstream > bugfixes without exposure to bugs in new features. Also, this emacs > is built agains glibc-2.6-2, which in light of bug 239344, is probably > a Good Thing. As long as the alternatives issues are straightened out first. The following bug was an F7Blocker until emacs-22.0.99 was removed from F7/downgraded to emacs-22.0.95-1.fc7 that is currently in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239745 I have verified that emacs-22.0.95-1.fc7 (the one currently in rawhide) works properly with glibc-2.6-2 (due in rawhide tomorrow), so upgrading to 22.0.99 for that reason alone appears unnecessary. So I would say that these are the choices: 1. Don't put emacs-22.0.99 into F7, and keep emacs-22.0.95 instead. 2. Put in emacs-22.0.99 without the alternatives /usr/bin/emacs changes which cause the regression of having no /usr/bin/emacs at all after upgrades. 3. Fix the scriptlets in emacs-22.0.99 to that a /usr/bin/emacs will exist after upgrades. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
