On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:33:21AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I repeatedly answered to your concerns. No, never. > To reiterate: > * I don't see any technical reason for inclusion of any static library > in a distribution. Your primary argument "numerical programs" is a > non-argument - You simply are in error. This was not the conclusion of the thread started here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-November/msg00713.html > * Exceptions from this are not FPC's business, but are a > political/management issue, which should be decided by a management > entity. The guidelines reflect this notion by forcing packages to > redirect such decisions to FESCo. They are definitely not political issues, they may be management issues. Anyway I prefer what seems to be agreed more generally about what to do in case of guidelines violations started in another thread. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
