Hans de Goede wrote : > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 13:39 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >> On Thursday, 17 May 2007 at 22:14, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:06:22 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >>> > >>>> This is just a reminder. > >>>> > >>>> These are all non-explicit package conflicts found in FE development. > >>>> I've filed several tickets plus a few more for FE<=6 (check out the > >>>> FE7Target bug) long ago. > > > >>> plib-devel - 1.8.4-8.fc6.i386 > >>> File conflict with: plib16-devel - 1.6.0-6.fc6.i386 > >>> /usr/include/plib/fnt.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/js.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netBuffer.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netChannel.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netMessage.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netMonitor.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netSocket.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/pu.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/sg.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/sl.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/slPortability.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/sm.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssg.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgAux.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgKeyFlier.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgaWaveSystem.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgconf.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ul.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ulRTTI.h > >>> > >>> plib16-devel - 1.6.0-6.fc6.i386 > >>> File conflict with: plib-devel - 1.8.4-8.fc6.i386 > >>> /usr/include/plib/fnt.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/js.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netBuffer.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netChannel.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netMessage.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netMonitor.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/netSocket.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/pu.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/sg.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/sl.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/slPortability.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/sm.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssg.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgAux.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgKeyFlier.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgaWaveSystem.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ssgconf.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ul.h > >>> /usr/include/plib/ulRTTI.h > >> plib16-devel should probably have an explicit conflict with plib-devel. > > A better approach would be to let one of the packages should install its > > headers into a different directory. > > > > Last time I talked about this with Matthias (the plib16 maintainer, I'm the > plib maintainer), we came to the conclusion that there are no packages > BuildRequiring plib16, and that it could be orphaned, so I guess that that is > the real solution. > > Matthias? Yup. I sort of forgot about it... Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.20-1.2948.fc6 Load : 0.23 0.35 0.37 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
