Re: packages that could need ExclusiveArch updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:25:40PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore (dennis@xxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > The following packages have ExcludeArch: ppc, but not ExcludeArch: ppc64.
> > > This may need adjusted if they want to build in the future:
> > >
> > > 915resolution
> > > alsa-tools
> > > glest
> > > gnome-applet-sensors
> > > google-perftools
> > > mono-debugger
> > > stripesnoop
> > > xeuphoric
> > > xfce4-sensors-plugin
> >
> > I'd much rather see these use ExclusiveArch: x86_64 %{ix86}  so they dont have 
> > issues for people building on other  archs.  im assuming the reason ppc is 
> > excluded is due to endianess issues
> 
> Looking at the list:
> 
> - *sensors* is 'whatever arches lm-sensors exists on' - probably x86_64 %{ix86}

And ppc.

> - ditto for 915resolution
> - mono-debugger presumably is supposed to match arches mono is available for.
>   Theoretically, it should be building on ppc.
> 
> The others I'm not sure why they exclude ppc.
> 
> Bill
> 

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp1LDZidcTHI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux