Re: packages that could need ExclusiveArch updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time Thursday 17 May 2007, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Josh Boyer (jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > Well... probably not for 915resolution.  That just doesn't exist on
> > ppc/ppc64.  Others I have no idea.
>
> <cutting the cc list>
>
> True it doesn't exist on ppc, but setting an exclusivearch for
> 'architectures that would have a intel 9xx chipset' might be more accurate.
>
> Bill
Thats exactly the point i was trying to make.  if a package really is just for 
one or two archs  make it so by using ExclusiveArch it helps all those people 
who build for other archs.  

there is at least sparc, alpha, and ia64 out there probably mips, arm and 
others also.

Dennis

Attachment: pgpyhWsUnjYEO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux