On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 12:32 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Sounds like a plan to me. Encouraging good changelog entries is, well, > good anyway - look at the quality of FC changelogs before and after the > daily rawhide-changes mails. In some cases (eg if the update requires user > actions etc) further commentary not really suitable to changelog notation > style might be needed but rpm changelog since last published package (or > even just the latest entry) would make a nice default. And one that > shouldn't be too troublesome for anybody since the message has already > been written once... > The problem with reusing changelog entries for update notification is that they are written for an entirely different audience: changelogs -> developers announcements -> users -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly