Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 22:22 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> You already read (over) it. Go up exactly three levels over your own
> post and be amused. 

Oh, I see. You're talking about the mtime bug and pretending it's a
problem with splitting packages. Yes, including mtime as a criterion
when deciding if files are 'identical' was a mistake from the beginning,
and should be fixed. Isn't there a bug filed for that already?

There is a coherent plan for fixing multilib in F8 -- it's not _just_ a
matter of fixing the packages which contain both binaries and
executables. Fixing the mtime bug in RPM should be part of that plan.

-- 
dwmw2

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux