On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:52:19PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 13:18 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > > o Breaks the majority of config files (that's where the 59% come from) > > > > Are these bugs in packaging or is this solved by the multiarch approach? > > Do you have examples? > > It's a fallacy. Any config files which would break are _already_ broken > with the existing setup. Please don't feed the trolls. samba and nss_db for example are currently not broken and would break the second you apply your proposal on it. That's a fact, not a fallacy. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpiwylitvbPd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
