On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 07:25 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 19.04.2007 07:14, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 07:10 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> On 18.04.2007 23:05, Brian Pepple wrote: > >> > > >>> /topic FESCO-Meeting -- MISC -- Vote on rebuilding packages with old > >>> disttag - jwb > >>> > >> Something related to this (mentioned on FAB-list 24 hours ago, but > >> didn't get any replies) to fix the problem in F8 and later: > >> > >> Why don't we just expand the disttag to something else without the > >> "fc<I>n</I>" in it in the devel branch? Then we don't have run into the > >> "package disttag doesn't match the release it is shipped in" problem > >> when a package is not rebuild during a devel cycle. A simple ".1" maybe > >> -- that should make everybody happy afaics: > > > > How would a mixture of .1 and .fc6 in the released fc7 make everybody > > happier than a mixture of .1 and .fc7 ? Sorry, I meant .1/.fc6 vs .fc6/.fc7. > OIOW: I'd say we simply change to what the distttag expands right after > F7 was branched, and then look at the repos by F8-test1 or test2 and > decide then what to do. > I don't see any real problem solved here, only cosmetics. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
